Monday, September 21, 2009

BONUS BLOG -- 1974: PHASE IV

What’s it about?

Following a strange event in space, a biologist notices peculiar behavior in ant colonies in the American southwest. Specifically, ants from different species appear to be communicating and working together. He gets funding to research the phenomenon, and brings along a young mathematician who has done work with computers decoding animal languages. But conflicting personalities cause the biologist and mathematician both to stay tight-lipped about their suspicions and discoveries.

As the project’s funding begins to run out, the scientists still have not observed any interesting ant activity. They decide to destroy a series of strange geometric structures (presumably built by the ants) to stimulate a response. When the response comes, it’s in the form of an overwhelming attack by the ants. The scientists repel it using a powerful poison, but the ants quickly adapt and begin severing the scientists’ links to the outside world.




Is it any good?

I first saw this movie as a freshman in college during a science fiction marathon. At the time, I thought it was pretty great -- despite being very different from most of the movies I had seen until then. Having seen a lot more movies since those salad days, I can say that PHASE IV falls into a category of understated, low budget cerebral (or pseudo-cerebral) 1970s flicks with a cynical streak that bridge the darker B-movies of the 1950s with the dour independent movies of the 1990s. It fits very much with COLOSSUS: THE FORBIN PROJECT (1970), PUNISHMENT PARK (1971), IDAHO TRANSFER (1973), and many others of the same sort.

It probably goes without saying at this point that I have a soft spot for exactly this sort of movie, so I enjoyed PHASE IV plenty the second time through as well. But I should say that the other person I saw this movie with the first time ten years ago thought it was horrible. He usually has pretty good taste in movies, so I guess the lesson here is that PHASE IV may affect people differently. If you decide to watch it, be warned. You may hate it!

PHASE IV is a thriller about ants that want to take over the world. They aren’t giant ants like in THEM! (1954) -- they’re just normal-sized ants that are super smart. How smart? They do communicate somehow, and the mathematician decodes a bit of their language. Mostly he translates the parts that mean “stop” and “go” and “turn right” -- sort of the LOGO level of ant communication. But there are implications in the movie that the ants are talking about a lot more that the humans can’t figure out.




More implausibly, the ants also seem very familiar with human technology and weaknesses. In their first attack on the research station, they disable the truck engine that the scientists are using for a generator. (It’s later revealed that it was left outside on purpose as “bait” and that there is a back-up generator inside the station as well.) I’m not totally clear how ants manage that -- presumably they gummed up the works in such a way as to cause an explosion. In later attacks, they focus beams of sunlight on the station to overheat the computers and people inside. Not only that, but they send commandos to specifically disable the air conditioner to make the roasting more effective.

The ants are also capable of building complex structures. To focus the beams of sunlight, for instance, they build mounds with highly polished surfaces pointing at the research station just so to catch the sunlight. So clearly some of the applications of this supposed ant intelligence are more plausible than others. But the humans have some fairly wacky technology as well. The mathematician, for instance, is somehow able to “hear” the ant language and correlate it with individual ant movements perfectly clearly -- despite there being thousands of ants swarming around. And the biologist manages to locate the colony’s queen without stepping foot outside the research station.




But those eyebrow-raising bits aside, the stand-off between man and ant is pretty interesting. It plays out like a chess game -- each side trying to penetrate particular weaknesses of the other. The ants, with their vastly superior numbers, get and keep the upper hand as soon as they are able to isolate the scientists. And since the biologist is weirdly stubborn, nobody on the outside really knows what is going on or that there may be any danger at all. (The mathematician didn’t even learn the truth until it was too late himself.) There’s a pretty obvious parable about working together versus keeping things to yourself not far under the surface of PHASE IV -- but luckily it’s pretty interesting for other reasons too.

The movie does have a lot of shots of ants doing a lot of ant-like things. I’m not sure exactly how these were created. If I had to guess, I’d say it’s a mixture of real ants placed in artificial environments, and possibly some miniature or stop-motion work. Surprisingly, it is always pretty clear what the ants are up to. One long sequence where a series of ants sacrifice themselves to bring the poison into the colony so that the queen can adapt herself to it is especially good. There’s also another pretty funny and exciting bit where the ants trying to sabotage the air conditioner run into a preying mantis that the biologist left inside as a deterrent.

The ending of the movie (as with almost all of its kind) gets pretty silly. People do things for no other reason than to move the plot forward out of the stalemate. The ants remain unavoidably inscrutable, but there’s still a long monologue about what they want and how they will get it. I guess really the more I think about the movie, the goofier it sounds. But it is a movie about ants that want to take over the world, after all, and when compared to any other insect swarm movie by any metric, I think it acquits itself extremely creditably.


8 comments:

  1. I remember seeing another 70s insect sci-fi/horror movie called the Swarm when I was young. I'm not sure how it would hold up today, but I was really scared of it back then.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I haven't seen THE SWARM, and I wasn't planning on watching it... (I have another of Irwin Allen's disasters on my list though.) But, on the other hand, I actually remember when killer bees were an issue of serious concern in the U.S. The movie does have reputation for being awful, but so do a lot of things that I watch.

    Also, PHASE IV has relatively little in the way of swarming bugs. There are couple swarm attacks and we do see the results of them (destroyed houses, dead livestock, crop circles), but mostly the ants are supposed to be scary because they can plot and outwit humans.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I always get confused when people talk about this film, since I read a short story that has the exact same plot but which doesn't really seem to be related. A bit of research idicates it was probably the novelisation, but that raises the question of why it was being published in Analog in the early 2000s.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Did the novelization include scenes with an ant's eye view? A lot of the movie is just ants doing ant things, and I'm not sure how that would translate to a book.

    ReplyDelete
  5. No, it was a really tense story from the perspective of the scientists trapped in a sort of portable office. I think it all started when one of the scientists taught the ants to play chess. But the stuff about trying to cook the scientists by mangling their air-conditioners all rings a bell. I probably still have the magazine somewhere, so I might dig it up.

    Anyway this film sounds like exactly the sort of thing I'd like.

    You should really watch THE SWARM - it is awful, but it is also pretty amazing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Did a bunch of ants kill a cop in this movie? Or am I thinking of an X-Files or something?

    ReplyDelete
  7. A cop gets eaten by a giant ant in THEM! But there are no cops in this movie at all as far as I recall.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I didn't realise so many more people were into Phase IV. I caught it as a kid on late night TV many moons ago and it stuck with me.

    Here's an article about it on my own blog, take a look if you get a chance.
    http://cinematheque.leithermagazine.com/2010/03/02/article-coulda-been-contenders/

    ReplyDelete