Monday, June 22, 2009

BONUS BLOG -- 1969: THE SEED OF MAN

What’s it about?

A young couple named Dora and Cino are diverted by a roadblock as they try to make it home from a trip one day. The officials at the roadblock administer medical tests, give them a six-month vaccine against all kinds of diseases, and tell the couple to strike out on foot across the countryside until they find a home to live in. No clear explanation is given, but it seems that plagues and wars have been raging across Europe (and possibly the world) and that the destruction of civilization as we know it is imminent.

Dora and Cino find a house on the seashore whose owner has apparently died of the plague. After disposing of his body, they move in to the house and begin hunting, farming and foraging to feed themselves. Cino also collects interesting artifacts -- like a giant wheel of Parmesan cheese -- and preserves them in a makeshift museum in the house. After weeks or months with no other human contact, a band of horsemen claiming to be representatives of the government arrive and tell the two that it’s their duty to help with repopulation efforts. But Dora is reluctant to bring a child into the post-apocalyptic world. Cino, though disappointed, seems to accept this state of affairs until the rotting carcass of a beached whale symbolically presages the arrival of a strange and beautiful woman who is more than willing to have children.




Is it any good?

Thanks to a few arbitrary formative experiences in college, I will forever believe that the stereotypical “European movie” mostly involves a couple of jaded and lethargic people hanging out on a barren and overcast beach, doing nothing much of anything while the sound of the surf and the wind drown out half the non sequiturs that make up the dialogue. THE SEED OF MAN is not exactly as bad as all that, but it also doesn’t do a whole lot to convince me that this stereotype isn’t at least partly based in fact.

The movie begins in a city somewhere in Europe -- presumably somewhere in Italy -- where Dora and Cino are eating in a restaurant. I was going to describe the restaurant as “futuristic” but honestly I’m not exactly sure if the movie is supposed to be set in the future or not. I’m not sure, for instance, if restaurants in Italy in 1969 would have plausibly had wall-sized televisions in them. (Seems unlikely.) And I don’t know whether the weird little jeep vehicle that Cino and Dora ride around in is just a run-of-the-mill ridiculous European car or if it’s supposed to be what cars look like in the future. (Can’t even guess on this one.)

But what is clear is that the world is undergoing some cataclysm, even though the exact nature of the cataclysm isn’t easy to discern. There are definitely both plague and war afoot, but it’s hard to tell how far-reaching they are and what countries they involve. A bombed-out London is mentioned, and there is a reference to the “electronic brains” that help wage the war. But once again it’s unclear whether we’re meant to understand that the militaries of the world are being controlled by computers (which would be futuristic), or whether the computers are simply enabling destruction on a wider scale than was ever possible before (which wouldn’t necessarily be).

It’s also never explained why Cino and Dora are picked out to be given vaccines and diverted to a relatively safe zone. Right before they meet the roadblock, they encounter a bus full of dead children -- presumably an indication that they’re getting closer to the epicenter of the cataclysm. The officials at the roadblock quiz them on their sexual health before giving them the vaccines, so it seems that there’s already some idea that the people they select will be those that can repopulate the country. But then they are simply told to start walking across the countryside, to find a home for themselves, and to live primitively until peace returns.




After Cino and Dora discover the seaside house, nothing much happens to disrupt their solitude for a long time. Cino talks about how he wants a child, and Dora rebuffs him. A blimp on the horizon that they go out to meet turns out to be an advertising balloon blown across Europe from England. Cino grows a neck beard and Dora starts wearing dresses she finds in the house. The surf and the wind drone on.

When the horsemen arrive, it seems like something unpleasant is going to happen to disrupt the peaceful life of Dora and Cino. But rather than a marauding gang, the riders turn out to be (or at least claim to be) representatives of the government. They inspect the house and ask why Dora isn’t pregnant yet. They even see the value in Cino’s museum and donate a typewriter and a painting to display in it. After taking blood samples from Dora and Cino, they tell them to start having children and ride off, never to be seen again.

The movie now enters its weirdest section. A sperm whale beaches itself within sight of the house -- an event that Cino is excited about but which depresses Dora. Not a lot of movies have beached whales in them, so it’s a pretty neat image on that level alone. Symbolically, the whale is supposed to represent -- well, I didn’t think about it that hard. Cino refers to the whale as Moby-Dick, so I guess lets just say it represents whatever Moby-Dick represents. The giant putrefying carcass of the whale eventually drives Dora from the house, but not before a beautiful and sexually available stranger shows up to seduce Cino and attempt to murder Dora.

I say “attempt to murder” since in the ensuing struggle it is actually Dora who kills the stranger. As if this wasn’t shocking enough, it’s strongly implied that she serves a human leg-roast for dinner that night -- which Cino unknowingly devours. I know this is the first part of the movie that actually sounds interesting, but frankly I wish that they had just cut out the stranger entirely if it was just going to end with murder and cannibalism. For one thing, it doesn’t fit the tone of anything else in the movie. For another, it just makes the main characters seem psychotic or callous. (Cino wonders for a minute where the stranger has gone, but then mostly shrugs it off as he gets a second helping of dinner.) None of it has any obvious consequences either -- it’s just another unconnected event like the advertising balloon that floats by early in the movie. The stinking whale carcass has more effect on the relationship of Dora and Cino than this murder. But while the balloon and the whale episodes feel like they are freighted with lyricism and symbolic possibilities, the bits with the stranger just feel absurd and clumsy.




The rotting whale carcass ultimately helps bring the movie to its conclusion. The smell drives Dora out of the seaside house to another that they discovered a little further inland. Throughout the whole movie, I had the feeling that the relationship was not really a very strong one. Perhaps Dora and Cino were just two young people out on a date, and world events beyond their control threw them closer together then they ever intended. That would at least partly explain Dora’s reluctance to have a child -- though there are of course plenty of other good reasons why she might prefer not to.

After the whale is completely skeletonized, Dora comes back again and the weirdness recommences. Cino devises a scheme to rape and impregnate her while she is asleep (presumably drugged) and then cruelly reveals the truth to her when she unwittingly begins to complain of the symptoms of morning sickness. But as Cino dances around Dora on the beach, taunting her, she suddenly explodes like a human bomb and the beach is left deserted of life as both of them are literally vaporized. And that is exactly the sort of confusing, ambiguous and unsatisfying ending I would expect from a stereotypical “European movie” -- so my prejudices and preconceptions are happily strengthened once again.

10 comments:

  1. Weird weird weird.

    The style reminds me of "3 Women," a Robert Altman film that has a bit less cannibalism and sci fi elements, but fits the "Strange Events That Are Probably Meaningful and Connected and Hey What Happened At the End Here?" theme.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Most of the similar movies I can think of are Scandanavian, German, and Italian. I sometimes wonder what it is about those continental types that make them apparently so bored with normal movies.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Also, I've never seen 3 WOMEN, but I did really want to write about a Robert Altman sci-fi movie at some point. Unfortunately, I wasn't willing to shell out $15 for a copy of COUNTDOWN, and the only other one I know of is QUINTET, which is not very good and I don't really want to watch again.

    I guess I might as well do my writing about QUINTET here then: it's supposedly structured to mimic a game that Altman & Friends invented for the movie (but the rules are never explained), it's set in a frozen ice world so it's impossible to tell one bearded guy in a fur coat from another, and it's filmed through a camera lens that was literally smeared with Vaseline for the entire shoot.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The basic plot of this sounds actually pretty interesting, in a weird sort of way. Too bad they seem to have blown it by being weird and dumb as all get out.

    Also are you ever gonna join the new TaBB?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oh it's not terrible as long as you don't mind a bit of pointless noodling in your movies. I didn't think it was a great movie, but it wasn't bad (or even too boring) either.

    And no, probably not. At least not anytime soon.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well, I guess I am just interested in the meandering escapades of a couple in the postapocalypse without all the fancy art touches that seem to plague this movie's second half.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Robert Altmas is a very interesting director, to me. I read a lengthy (book-length) interview with him, in which he explained that he just plum enjoys making movies. He compared it to playing at the beach- he said you get a bunch of friends together, decide to build a sand castle, say "You make the towers, I'll dig the moat, you collect seashells," do your best, and eventually the waves will take it away and you do it all over again the next day.

    He said that once a friend of his in the movie business was talking about how much he was looking forward to going on vacation, and Robert Altman was confused, because making movies was relaxing and fun for him- he didn't need any break from it.

    Altman's films, I feel, really reflect this attitude. I think he really makes films for himself and his friends, and when we (the audience) get it, he's happy, but if we don't he's just willing to do it all over again. The dude tries some pretty great stuff- I love The Long Goodbye- and his filming method is very unique. He sets up individual mikes on all his actors, and then chooses what dialogue to put in the final film in the editing room. He tells his cameramen to follow what they find interesting.

    It makes for these films with very natural atmosphers, as if you've stumbled into this story and it's up to your to pick up the pieces. He doesn't always make good movies, but they are interesting...

    ReplyDelete
  8. I haven't seen a lot of his movies, but I really loved some of his recent ones -- GOSFORD PARK and THE COMPANY particularly.

    Part of what disappointed me about QUINTET was that the collaborative parts of it aren't as obvious -- there's much less of the sense of characters living in a world where everybody has a full life.

    But it turns out that the cast and crew all got together before and during filming and invented the game which is central to the movie's plot, and then started building the movie off of that. I can definitely see how that would be fun to do, but it also means the fun parts are a lot less obvious to the people watching it as compared with some of his other movies.

    Another recent and really wonderful movie that reminded me of Altman's best stuff was RACHEL GETTING MARRIED. If you haven't seen it, I really recommend it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. If you're looking for an interesting 1979 movie, I suggest Oscar, Kina and the Laser.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I am definitely interested in non-U.S./non-U.K. movies, so I will look for it! But IMDb doesn't even have much information about it, so I'm not very hopeful that it's available over here.

    ReplyDelete